Research has found that bodily movements are symbolically
associated with movement in time. Clockwise movements are associated with
progression into the future, whereas counterclockwise movements are associated
with the reversal of time, and hence with regression into the past (Topolinski & Sparenberg, 2012). Progression
in time is associated with novelty, and conversely, regression into the past is
associated with returning to the old and familiar. A recent research study
found that performing clockwise movements actually increased a person’s preference
for novelty, whilst counterclockwise movements increased the preference for
familiar things. An even more intriguing finding was that clockwise movements even
increased self-ratings of openness to experience, a normally stable dimension
of personality (Topolinski & Sparenberg,
2012).
In this study, participants performed tasks such as turning
cranks, or rotating rolls of paper towels, in either a clockwise or
counterclockwise direction. Participants were told the movements were part of a
test on multi-tasking, so as far as they knew these actions were simply
meaningless body movements. One finding was that when asked to choose different
flavours of candy participants who had performed a clockwise movement chose
more unusual flavours, whereas those who made a counterclockwise movement
preferred more common ones. Thus, the clockwise movers were more willing to try
new experiences.
Willingness to try new things is related to the personality
trait openness to experience. Generally speaking, there are consistent
individual differences in people’s levels of openness to experience and these
differences tend to be stable over time. Therefore, I found it particularly
fascinating that participants who performed a task involving clockwise
movements with their hands subsequently self-reported significantly higher
levels of openness to experience compared to those who performed
counterclockwise motions. As noted in a previous article, research has found that increases in a person’s state level of
openness to experience can be experimentally induced by asking a person to
imagine performing actions associated with being very open (Schutte, Malouff, Segrera, Wolf, & Rodgers, 2003).
This study was much more subtle in that participants were not consciously aware
that the task they were performing had anything to do with their openness.
An intervention that could increase or decrease openness,
could potentially be used to influence attitudes and behaviour related to this
trait. High openness to experience is associated with a wide range of things
besides willingness to try new things, such as political liberalism as opposed
to conservatism, artistic creativity, intellectual curiosity, less conventional
religious belief but also greater acceptance of mystical and paranormal beliefs. Research has not yet examined whether having people perform clockwise
or counterclockwise motions would influence any of these things. It would be
interesting to examine whether, for example, a person’s liking for a liberal or
conservative political candidate could be influenced by such a procedure.
Similarly, people could be asked to perform a creative task and their degree of
creativity could be rated to determine if prior clockwise movements have a
beneficial effect compared to counterclockwise ones.
Higher openness is also associated with intellectual
abilities and with general knowledge. Therefore, students about to sit a test
might be advised to perform clockwise movements and avoid counterclockwise
ones, in order to better access their potential! This too could be
experimentally tested by determining if test performance is influenced by this
kind of intervention.
As noted in a previous
article, research has found that experimental manipulations to increase
analytical thinking as opposed to intuitive thinking tend to decrease religious
belief, such as belief in God. Because higher openness to experience is
associated to a modest extent with less belief in God, it is possible that
clockwise movements might reduce belief in God due to an associated increase in
openness, whereas counterclockwise would strengthen such belief. Higher
openness is also associated to an extent with greater belief in the paranormal,
so similar interventions might influence belief in things like telepathy,
witchcraft, and “New Age” ideas.
Topolinski and Sparenberg (2012)
noted that movement direction orients a person to the past or the future.
Therefore, counterclockwise movements might increase nostalgia for the
past whereas clockwise movements might increase interest in speculation about
future-related concerns, such as advances in technology. Perhaps this could be
tested for example, by asking participants to write a story after performing
movement tasks and offering them the choice of writing about a historical event
or an imagined future society.
Future research could examine whether other major personality
traits and their associated behaviours could be influenced by subtle actions
with metaphorical connotations.
This article also appears on Psychology Today on
my blog Unique - Like Everybody Else.
Other posts discussing the possibilities of priming
Opening the Mind: Where Skepticism and Superstition Meet
Reason Versus Faith? The Interplay of Intuition and Rationality In Supernatural Belief
Think Like a Man: Effects of Gender Priming on Cognition
Are Sex And Religion Natural Enemies?
© Scott McGreal. Please do not reproduce without
permission. Brief excerpts may be quoted as long as a link to the original
article is provided.
Further reading
For a sceptical critique of the statistical power of Topolinski & Sparenberg's study, see this paper, pp. 24 -27.
Other posts discussing the possibilities of priming
Opening the Mind: Where Skepticism and Superstition Meet
Reason Versus Faith? The Interplay of Intuition and Rationality In Supernatural Belief
Think Like a Man: Effects of Gender Priming on Cognition
Are Sex And Religion Natural Enemies?
References
Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Segrera,
E., Wolf, A., & Rodgers, L. (2003). States reflecting the Big Five
dimensions. Personality and Individual
Differences, 34(4), 591-603. doi: 10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00031-4
Topolinski,
S., & Sparenberg, P. (308). Turning the Hands of Time: Clockwise Movements
Increase Preference for Novelty. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3
(3) DOI: 10.1177/1948550611419266
I defintely feel like this is a very true study and makes a alot of sense. When moving counter- clockwise your brain is in a unfamiliar moving cycle oppose to how it norally operates. However; I have heard people say that most left handlers are abnormal people and this might be another good study to research as too if they move clockwise or counter clockwise
ReplyDeleteIn two of the four experiments, participants made turning movements using both hands, so this might have overcome any preference for the dominant hand. The authors' theory is that most cultures symbolically associate clockwise movement with forward movement of time, so if this were true then handedness would not seem to make a difference. However, they did not assess handedness so it remains an open question whether left-handers would respond differently.
Delete